Value at Risk (VaR) and Conditional VaR (CVaR):
From: | To: |
Value at Risk (VaR) is a statistical measure that quantifies the level of financial risk within a firm, portfolio, or position over a specific time frame. It estimates how much a set of investments might lose (with a given probability), given normal market conditions, in a set time period.
Conditional Value at Risk (CVaR), also known as Expected Shortfall, is a risk assessment measure that quantifies the amount of tail risk in an investment portfolio. Unlike VaR which gives the worst-case loss for a given confidence level, CVaR gives the expected loss given that the loss has exceeded the VaR threshold.
Where:
Details: VaR and CVaR are crucial for risk management, portfolio optimization, regulatory compliance, and capital allocation decisions in financial institutions.
Tips: Enter confidence level (typically 95-99%), time horizon in days, portfolio value in USD, and annualized volatility percentage. The calculator uses parametric (variance-covariance) method.
Q1: What's the difference between VaR and CVaR?
A: VaR tells you the maximum loss at a certain confidence level, while CVaR tells you the average loss beyond the VaR threshold.
Q2: What are common confidence levels?
A: 95% (1.645σ), 97.5% (1.96σ), and 99% (2.326σ) are most common in practice.
Q3: What are VaR calculation methods?
A: Parametric (variance-covariance), historical simulation, and Monte Carlo simulation are the three main approaches.
Q4: What are VaR limitations?
A: VaR doesn't measure worst-case loss, assumes normal distributions, and can underestimate tail risk.
Q5: Why use CVaR?
A: CVaR is coherent risk measure (unlike VaR) and better captures tail risk, making it preferred for risk management.